Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS) (#654)

> Hi @krgovind - Ok that's great! Is the revised explainer stable at this point?

@torgo : Sorry, not yet, but once [PR #44](https://github.com/WICG/CHIPS/pull/44), it will be. (We'll give it a few days for community review before merging it in)

> Hi @krgovind! Thanks for letting us know that you're removing CHIPS's dependency on first party sets.
> 
> I've had a look at your updated explainer... Can I just check my understanding? Does it mean that if a site is part of a first party set, then the double-keyed cookie is double-keyed to the first-party set rather than the specific domain — but if it's not part of a first-party set, then everything operates according to domain / origin? Is that correct?
>

@hadleybeeman That's correct. To be specific, the "site" in question is the top-level/embedder website.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/654#issuecomment-1161847755

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/654/1161847755@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2022 14:47:55 UTC