- From: Hadley Beeman <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 01:31:49 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2022 08:32:01 UTC
Hi @mmccool! Thanks for this. We've reviewed it in our W3C TAG meetings this week. Apologies for the delay; we wanted to look at this in parallel with ([our review of Web of Things (WoT) Architecture 1.1](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/736). It looks fine to us, and we are happy to see the strengthened security and privacy work. We also note that your issue 791 from our previous review, [should be clearer about where the definition of the HTTP Protocol Binding is](https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/791), is still open. Can you tell us a bit about your thoughts/plans for this? It looks like you're choosing to defer it — we are curious to hear if it's causing you trouble or why deferring it made sense for the group. Many thanks! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/715#issuecomment-1154879789 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/715/1154879789@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2022 08:32:01 UTC