Re: [whatwg/storage] Add top-level site to storage key. (#127) (PR #144)

Its unclear to me if this PR is something we are comfortable merging into the spec now or not.  Do we have adequate consensus on using top-level site for partitioning?  My sense is we have at least two engines between chromium and gecko, but there are still some differences to webkit (ephemeral 3rd party storage).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/144#issuecomment-1150284330
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/storage/pull/144/c1150284330@github.com>