Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] First-Party Sets (#342)

Hi all. We have revisited this again in our W3C TAG meetings this week.

The TAG has agreed to close this review. We began our review buy writing this [statement](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/blob/main/reviews/first_party_sets_feedback.md), and we have since dedicated extensive time to providing feedback and engaging with the spec authors to improve this design, and do not feel that our suggestions are resulting in evolution of the feature.

We remain concerned about a number of issues, including the privacy implications of this design, and the problems that could be created with any of the proposed governance models for first party sets. Equally, we haven't been able to come up with a governance model that would avoid the same problems. 

These concerns extend to any spec or feature with a dependency on first party sets, though we look forward to seeing additional privacy-related specs that are decoupled from FPS.

We understand that this work is moving to WICG, and will be happy to review future documents that address the necessary use cases after further incubation and demonstrated support from other stakeholders in the W3C community.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/342#issuecomment-1150056909
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/342/1150056909@github.com>