- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 10:00:31 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2022 17:00:43 UTC
I don't think the EBNF allows for the second code point to be U+0001 when the first is `:`, for instance. At least the intent was to prevent that. Does EBNF work completely differently from ABNF in that `|` doesn't signify OR but instead "union"? (I didn't see "An equivalent EBNF is the following" initially and I don't think what it states is correct.) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1079#issuecomment-1148932239 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1079/c1148932239@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2022 17:00:43 UTC