- From: Lea Verou <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 09:53:22 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 6 June 2022 16:53:34 UTC
Hi @mfreed7, we took another look today and we understand your reasoning and are happy with the proposal so we are going to close this. One thing we wondered about: once this is implemented are there any remaining use cases for `getRangeAt()`? It seems that the new method covers all of them, and since it returns a static range it's more performant and less error-prone. If that assumption is correct, would it make sense to deprecate `getRangeAt()` and name the new method in a more generic way (e.g. `getRange()`)? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/694#issuecomment-1147664032 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/694/1147664032@github.com>
Received on Monday, 6 June 2022 16:53:34 UTC