Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Storage Partitioning (Issue #382)

No objection! I think when I started on the patch linked above, Storage Key wasn't exported and the intent was that storage endpoints needed to live in a bottle (or some such - it's been a while) and scoping was completely implicit. If that's changed, or we can do the work more incrementally, I'm down for reviewing PRs.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/382#issuecomment-1143881869
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/382/1143881869@github.com>

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2022 17:02:56 UTC