Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP 101 response NOT for websockets (Issue #1397)

> > Yes, the way I understand a 109 etc. should simply be ignored (until someone specifies that it does something).
> 
> Okay, so when there's multiple 103s we only acknowledge the first, but if there's a couple of 105s first a subsequent 103 will work fine?

Yes, it's more of an application (HTML) decision specific to 103.

> 
> I agree that we could rejigger this when there's another 1xx status that needs special processing.

Great

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1397#issuecomment-1198279806
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1397/1198279806@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 28 July 2022 15:06:50 UTC