- From: Hadley Beeman <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 02:08:06 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2022 09:08:18 UTC
Hello! Thanks for your review request, and it's nice to see the progress on DCAT. It would be really helpful for us if the explainer could go into a bit of detail about the "more pressing use cases and requests among those left unaddressed in the previous standardization round" that version 3 is addressing. It would help us to understand if/how you've accomplished what you set out to do with DCAT 3.0. We also try to join up work across working groups and W3C specs. We see that you've created new terms (such as dcat:first, dcat:prev and dcat:last) which could instead be covered by something like [RDF lists](https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_collectionvocab) — could you tell us why you made that choice? Are there any other opportunities to reuse existing work in DCAT 3.0? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/758#issuecomment-1195215972 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/758/1195215972@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2022 09:08:18 UTC