- From: James M Snell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 17:55:06 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2022 00:55:29 UTC
> Succinctness alone is not a compelling argument in my opinion, because the new reader mode is more verbose than using new Response: No, definitely not the only argument. The goal is to standardize the pattern even in cases where `Response`/`Request` are not used. If all I want is to be able to consume a `ReadableStream` as a concatenated text string, I shouldn't have to create a `Response` object to do so. The `ReadableStream.prototype.arrayBuffer()` option would be a good alternative to the body reader proposal, although `ReadableStream.prototype.blob()` might be better as it gives more opportunity for internal optimizations. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1238#issuecomment-1175646922 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/1238/1175646922@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2022 00:55:29 UTC