- From: Tom Schuster <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2022 12:35:52 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 2 July 2022 19:36:09 UTC
Thanks for your example. I think this is a good enough justification. `AsyncGenerator.prototype.return` accepts an value argument so we might as well just use it. I don't know who was heavily involved in the design of AsyncGenerator at TC39, but it might still be nice to ask what they think. [My implementation](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1772772) should now be feature complete, but I haven't ran your tests yet. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1083#issuecomment-1172950193 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/streams/pull/1083/c1172950193@github.com>
Received on Saturday, 2 July 2022 19:36:09 UTC