Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Arbitrary clipboard types (Issue #165)

The Web Editing Working Group just discussed `Arbitrary clipboard types`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;Travis> Topic: Arbitrary clipboard types<br>
&lt;Travis> github: https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/issues/165<br>
&lt;Travis> BoCupp: from our last meeting, it sounds like we are flexible and willing to adopt AnneVK's proposal.<br>
&lt;Travis> AnneVK is OK with his own proposal..<br>
&lt;Travis> Microsoft is OK with it.<br>
&lt;Travis> whsieh: Would like a bit more time to think about it... do like the shape of this proposal more than the unsanitized flag, though.<br>
&lt;Travis> .. I'll give it some thought and post something here on this issue in about a week.<br>
&lt;Travis> .. was there some other issue that went into more detail?<br>
&lt;Travis> .. I was thinking of #150<br>
&lt;Travis> .. (https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/issues/150)<br>
&lt;Travis> BoCupp: I think AnneVK split these into two issues... one was about the shape of the API (letting the author pick something from the clipboard)<br>
&lt;BoCupp> https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/issues/150#issuecomment-1031684598<br>
&lt;Travis> .. the other about aligning between getData (datatransfer) and behavior of async API.<br>
&lt;Travis> .. so user agents may optional transfer that content.<br>
&lt;Travis> whsieh: I'll leave a comment by next week.<br>
&lt;Travis> action: whsieh to leave a comment on https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/issues/165 in support or with other perspectives.<br>
</details>


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/clipboard-apis/issues/165#issuecomment-1035120978

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/clipboard-apis/issues/165/1035120978@github.com>