Re: [whatwg/storage] 'obtain a storage key' not currently suitable for non-storage APIs (Issue #131) from Anne van Kesteren on 2022-02-08 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2022)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 23:55:02 -0800
To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/storage/issues/131/1032310408@github.com>

>  If we instead went with something like "obtain a storage key for non-storage purposes" it avoids this problem but is also more wordy.

Let's do that.

I don't have a strong opinion on the opaque origin question. I'm fine with keeping support for that. It seems to work reasonably in Firefox.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/issues/131#issuecomment-1032310408
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/storage/issues/131/1032310408@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2022 07:55:14 UTC