Re: [whatwg/storage] 'obtain a storage key' not currently suitable for non-storage APIs (Issue #131) from Anne van Kesteren on 2022-02-07 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2022)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 03:23:55 -0800
To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/storage/issues/131/1031358438@github.com>

Thank you for working on this! I think as per https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3054 the opaque origin requirement can likely stay.

What do you think about making this algorithm delegate to something like "obtain a non-storage storage key" that does everything apart from the "has disabled storage" check?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/storage/issues/131#issuecomment-1031358438
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/storage/issues/131/1031358438@github.com>

Received on Monday, 7 February 2022 11:24:07 UTC