Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Consider mechanisms to bypass the service worker for things that we know won't be in it's cache (#1026)

FYI, the experiment facebook ran to try to bypass SW for unnecessary subresource requests did not yield a performance improvement:

https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1584#issuecomment-1006063126

Just wanted to cross-link that here as a data point.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1026#issuecomment-1029405384
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1026/1029405384@github.com>

Received on Thursday, 3 February 2022 21:11:35 UTC