Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Early design review for the Topics API (Issue #726)

Hi @jkarlin thanks for this. We discussed in [breakout today](https://github.com/w3ctag/meetings/blob/gh-pages/2022/telcons/12-19-agenda.md). One concern we have is the risk that publishers might try to detect whether the user is using a browser with the topics API loaded / enabled and attempt to deny service if the API is not implemented. This is a similar issue what was discussed in your response to the security & privacy questionnaire for the API's behaviour in incognito mode. In both cases it feels like the result should be that the publisher should not be able to tell whether the topics API is disabled/not implemented. Is this the case?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/726#issuecomment-1359030277
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/726/1359030277@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2022 09:00:09 UTC