- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 03:04:33 -0800
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 17 December 2022 11:04:46 UTC
I'm very pessimistic about browsers getting there. The amount of anger we get any time file: URLs get less access to new features than the actual web is high (e.g. https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/8121), and actively taking away the ability to `fetch()` other file: content seems unlikely to go well. Anyway, I'm ambivalent the proposal at hand. I like the idea of getting at least surface-level interop. I think I would slightly prefer picking some other representative value (e.g. Chromium's "`file://`") for file URL origins, to represent "here be dragons", and leaving "`null`" for actually-opaque origins that have well-defined semantics. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/506#issuecomment-1356182181 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/506/1356182181@github.com>
Received on Saturday, 17 December 2022 11:04:46 UTC