- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:47:35 -0800
- To: whatwg/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2022 01:47:49 UTC
I think `FrozenArray<>` has its place. It's the clearly-correct choice for something that cannot ever change after creation. Its name seems very on-point to me. I agree that you should not be able to put by-value types inside FrozenArrays. I think we should at least copy over the existing statement for ObservableArray, and probably expand it to annotated or nullable types with those as inner types. I don't understand why we'd restrict promises from being held by these types. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/1243#issuecomment-1350230605 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1243/1350230605@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2022 01:47:49 UTC