- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 20:59:34 -0800
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 5 December 2022 04:59:46 UTC
@domenic approved this pull request. LGTM modulo the variable naming discussion > @@ -3345,20 +3345,19 @@ console.log(url.searchParams.get('b')); // "~"</code></pre> <ol> <li> - <p>If <var>init</var> is a <a>sequence</a>, then <a for=list>for each</a> <var>pair</var> in + <p>If <var>init</var> is a <a>sequence</a>, then <a for=list>for each</a> <var>tuple</var> of Honestly I think _subSequence_ or _innerSequence_ would be a better name. It's confusing to use the variable name _tuple_ for something that's actually an Infra list/IDL sequence. For example, at first I wrote a comment below "Why not just append _tuple_ directly, instead of appending (_tuple_[0], _tuple_[1])?" But now I see that would be a type error. I was misled by the variable name. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/717#pullrequestreview-1203858221 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/url/pull/717/review/1203858221@github.com>
Received on Monday, 5 December 2022 04:59:46 UTC