> Hi - just picking this up today at our f2f - @xfq we're largely happy to see this work proceed. Before closing, can you confirm back that you've discussed the additional manifest fields - especially the mini-app specific ones - with the web apps working group to make sure there isn't a collision with any work happening in web app manifest itself? > > /cc @marcoscaceres Thanks, Dan. The MiniApp WG intends to reuse web app manifest as much as possible. Basically, we have identified the overlap of the [`id`](https://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/#id-member) and [`app_id`](https://www.w3.org/TR/miniapp-manifest/#app_id-member) members in the specs. We included the MiniApp `app_id` time ago and are now discussing the alignment in w3c/miniapp-manifest#43 and w3c/manifest#1048. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/752#issuecomment-1211683247 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/752/1211683247@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2022 08:18:47 UTC