- From: Peter Linss <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 23:34:19 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2022 06:34:31 UTC
@dlibby unfortunately there's not a lot of prior art of code not triggering synchronous layout and style computation. But this is something we're trying to fix. Existing cases tend to be bad for user experience and overall performance. We do have a general [principle](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/#leave-the-web-better) about not using the existence of less than ideal designs as license to repeat the mistake. We understand that making the proposed `adjust()` method async raises further complications, but we would like to invite your group to discuss our concern and offer possible alternatives. We've also opened a [new issue](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-principles/issues/388) about the general problem of synchronous layout and style and welcome your group's input there. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/725#issuecomment-1211600691 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/725/1211600691@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2022 06:34:31 UTC