- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 07:21:07 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/761@github.com>
Wotcher TAG! I'm requesting a TAG review of [the linear() CSS easing function](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-easing-2/#the-linear-easing-function). This is a custom easing function that allows easings to be defined by a series of points that are linearly interpolated. The idea is that this allows to approximate a lot of custom easings in a simple way. There's a lot more of background in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/229. - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): See discussion linked above. This is a relatively simple feature that allows you to provide the points of an easing function and interpolate linearly between them. - Specification URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-easing-2/#the-linear-easing-function - Tests: https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-easing?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=linear-timing - User research: N/A - Security and Privacy self-review²: This doesn't expose any new information. - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/ - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): - Jake Archibald (@jakearchibald), Google - David Shin (@dshin-moz), Mozilla - Emilio Cobos Álvarez (@emilio), Mozilla - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: N/A - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: - https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/229 - https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7533 - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1764126 Further details: - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/) - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: Not super urgent, but I think it should be a relatively straight-forward review, it is relatively simple and allows extension / further improvements. - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: None, I think We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option): 🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for **each point of feedback** -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/761 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/761@github.com>
Received on Monday, 1 August 2022 14:21:20 UTC