[w3ctag/design-reviews] Element.isVisible review (Issue #734)

Hello,

I'm requesting a TAG review of Element.isVisible.

Element.isVisible() returns true if the element is visible, and false if it is not. It checks a variety of factors that would make an element invisible, including visibility, content-visibility, and opacity.

  - Explainer: https://github.com/WICG/display-locking/blob/main/explainers/isvisible.md

  - Specification URL: https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-element-isvisible

  - Security and Privacy self-review: https://github.com/WICG/display-locking/blob/main/privacy-assessments/isvisible.md

  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - @jarhar (Google, implementor)
      - @tabatkins (Google, spec author)
      - @vmpstr (Google)
   
  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: Google, Chromium
  - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6850

  - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): https://chromestatus.com/feature/5163102852087808


Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/)
  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: None, but this feature assists with successful adoption of content-visibility: hidden
  - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG
  - This work is being funded by: Google

  💬 leave review feedback as a **comment in this issue** and @-notify [github usernames]

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/734

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/734@github.com>