Re: [whatwg/streams] Do the abort steps of ReadableStreamPipeTo really guarantee the abort callback to be called before cancel? (Issue #1229) from Mattias Buelens on 2022-04-26 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from April 2022)

From: Mattias Buelens <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:14:53 -0700
To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/1229/1110302854@github.com>

> Will #1208 change the behavior here as Gecko does?

In its current state, no.

Personally, I think we *should* make `pipeTo()` do more things synchronously when possible, especially when the timing and results of those actions are observable by author code (i.e. when the readable and/or writable stream is constructed by author code). See https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/1208#discussion_r793955072 for Domenic's idea on how to make that happen. But that should probably go into a separate PR, since #1208 is already quite large as it is. 😛

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1229#issuecomment-1110302854

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/1229/1110302854@github.com>

Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2022 22:15:05 UTC