Re: [whatwg/url] Opaque hosts: realistic examples and origins? (Issue #690) from Anne van Kesteren on 2022-04-22 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from April 2022)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:12:41 -0700
To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/url/issues/690/1106706691@github.com>

@karwa same opaque origin becomes relevant if the `data:` URL document creates a `blob:` URL worker. The `data:` URL and the `blob:` URL will share an origin (and authority) in that case. You could special case a bunch of things throughout, but I think the current setup is actually quite nice.

@domenic according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_URI_schemes there are a number of them. Don't think any are in browsers, except for maybe `web+` and such? For a moment I thought `stun:` and `turn:`, but those end up with paths similar to `blob:` URLs.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/690#issuecomment-1106706691
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/url/issues/690/1106706691@github.com>

Received on Friday, 22 April 2022 17:12:53 UTC