Re: [whatwg/dom] Consider adding AbortController.prototype.follow(signal) (#920)

Thanks @shaseley, I opened an issue there, mainly to suggest an additional requirement for this feature that it either uses or obsoletes the current "follow" primitive in the specification.

@benlesh I wanted to ask if you could elaborate on what you wrote above:

> [E]very single use case I have requires the following signal to have its own controller so it can be aborted separately, which removes the abort logic that was added to the parent.

In particular I'm not sure I understand what you mean by the very last part of that sentence.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/920#issuecomment-1106260861
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/920/1106260861@github.com>