Re: [w3c/editing] clarifications for the pickling design proposal (Issue #393)

As far as I can tell, I see the following questions not yet cleared:

- one more question @snianu : Do I understand that it makes sense for content types communities to actually agree on naming pickles' names if they want interoperability in advance? ([here](https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/393#issuecomment-1057475608))

- Shouldn't permissions be persisted? E.g. The browser would remember that copying pickled-MathML-content from site Y into app Z was allowed. If yes, there should be a recommendation to expire and/or offer a way to manage such permissions. (this is a rephrase of the misunderstandings above)

- I am still entirely perplex on the 100 limit, maybe we should open a new issue on this. When I see that more and more platforms consider the web as the centre of everything, reducing the amount of atoms it could write for that purpose to 0,6% sounds a bit ridiculous. I'm only asking to raise it.

Thanks in advance.


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/393#issuecomment-1099269552
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/editing/issues/393/1099269552@github.com>