Re: [whatwg/fetch] Editorial suggestion: rename "fetch finale" (Issue #1419)

Well yes, but it's also the logical end of the fetch algorithm, right? At that point we have identified a response, perform the final checks, and return it. It's not the end of networking activity though so I can see how it might be confusing.

I would prefer this being some name with "fetch" in it, similar to the other fetch algorithms. Perhaps "handle fetch response" although I guess that could be confusing with SW's "handle fetch".

Would "fetch response finale" give the same confusion? I guess "fetch response handover" (no space in handover) isn't too bad either.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1419#issuecomment-1088692799
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1419/1088692799@github.com>