- From: Matt Giuca <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 19:17:11 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/988/review/762640604@github.com>
@mgiuca commented on this pull request. > + The [=identity=] takes the form of a URL, which is same origin as the + start URL. + </p> + <p>The [=identity=] is used by user agents to uniquely identify the + application universally. When the user agent sees a manifest with an + [=identity=] that does not correspond to an already-installed application, + it SHOULD treat that manifest as a description of a distinct + application, even if it is served from the same URL as that of another + application. When the user agent sees a manifest with an [=identity=] + matching that of an already-installed application, it SHOULD be used as + a signal that this manifest is a replacement for the already-installed + application's manifest, and not a distinct application, even if it is + served from a different URL than the one seen previously. + </p> + <p> + The [=identity=] is considered matching when the processed |manifest|["id"] [=url/equal|equals=]. This is grammatically incorrect ("equals" what?). Also "matching" isn't properly defined even though it's used above. I would just delete this paragraph and then formalize the sentence in the previous paragraph: > When the user agent sees a manifest with an identity matching that of an already-installed application, ... becomes > When the user agent sees a manifest _manifest_ where _manifest_["id"] [equals](https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-url-equals) the identity of an already-installed application, ... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/988#pullrequestreview-762640604
Received on Friday, 24 September 2021 02:17:24 UTC