- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:29:33 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/988/review/761530360@github.com>
@marcoscaceres commented on this pull request. > + <p> + User agents SHOULD re-fetch and process the manifest on every page + load. When the processing is successful, user agents MAY apply updated + manifest to any current and future <a>application contexts</a> + associated with the application. When the user agent fetches a + manifest as part of an update check, it MUST [=url/equal|compare=] the fetched + processed manifest's [=manifest/identity=] with the identity of the + app being updated. If it is not equal, the user agent MUST NOT + update the installed application's manifest. + </p> + <section> + <h3> + Privacy and security consideration + </h3> + <p> + User agents SHOULD be careful about performing update to manifest > It seems a very different UX from re-install as it's performed without user action. Agree. > How should I describe this better? I think what you stated in this paragraph is good (in as far that it does highlight what the risks are, and what browsers MAY choose to do about it). So yeah, if you move this up, I think that will give us a good foundation to build on. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/988#discussion_r714415902
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2021 01:29:46 UTC