Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should network state be keyed beyond the top-level site (#1035)

> Per https://github.com/wanderview/quota-storage-partitioning/blob/main/explainer.md it seems that @wanderview et al plan to use
>
> `<top-frame-site>`

I don't think that is accurate.  The SW partitioning proposal would effectively key on `<top-frame-site, document-site>` where the `document-site` is equal to the service worker origin's site.  This is enforced by service workers being same-origin to any controlled documents.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1035#issuecomment-925005082