Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MiniApp Lifecycle (#523)

Hi @xfq  – We're just reviewing in the TAG virtual f2f today. A few things we noted:

1. The mapping of Miniapp states to other w3c specs may be innacurate - in particular the mapping to service worker states.

2. The lifecycle document doesn't reference Manifest at all. It was our understanding that Miniapps would use the manifest file with the Miniapp extensions and that doesn't seem to be referenced in the document.

3. It doesn't look like you're referencing ServiceWorker either - is there a Miniapp state which makes use of ServiceWorker?

4. When a Miniapp is launched what origin can it be said to have, with regard to the web's security model? That would seem to be important from a lifecycle point of view.

We also note that the Page Lifecycle document that you point to as comparison is out of date and itself needs to be updated (in particular to reflect installation via Manifest, which is missing). 

We think it's worth considering whether these lifecycle efforts (MiniApps, web pages, PWA) could be consolidated or brought together in some way.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/523#issuecomment-920704365

Received on Thursday, 16 September 2021 08:37:44 UTC