- From: Kagami Sascha Rosylight <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:16:23 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2021 22:16:36 UTC
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/107#issuecomment-917854587 makes sense to me, and still I'd prefer a general solution for automation purpose e.g. BCD mentioned above.
My second random thought, which also covers signature and argument support detection:
```webidl
// Given this IDL:
interface Bar {
foo(Bar bar);
foo((boolean or DOMString) union);
foo(float f, unsigned short s);
};
dictionary Bar {
DOMString bar;
};
```
```js
Foo.prototype.foo[Symbol.inspect];
inspectSignature(Foo.prototype.foo);
// returns:
// [
// { bar: String },
// [[Boolean, String]],
// [Number, Number]
// ]
```
(Not sure how to differentiate optional arguments though.)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/107#issuecomment-919551305
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2021 22:16:36 UTC