Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Add `id` member to web application manifest spec (#668)

@kenchris and I looked at this today, and the use-case makes sense. Also, we were very happy to see that you put in a lot of thought for cases like takeover.

There are things that we would like some clarification in the explainer or spec before people start writing posts about this.

1. What constitutes a valid ID? Anything goes, or does it have to be limited to a specific subset of unicode?
2. What are good practices for an ID? (e.g. Don't use obvious words, like 'test')

One more thing to clarify - what venue will this end up in? We made an educated guess and assumed Web Apps, but let us know if that is not the case.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/668#issuecomment-918863854