Re: [whatwg/streams] Piping to writable streams with HWM 0? (#1158)

Sorry, still confused...

> "I have no queue, so I couldn't consume a chunk before, but I'm ready to consume one now (because I have a taker for it)".

compared to

> With HWM = 0, the stream is asking not to put anything its queue, except for the case where it wants a chunk. Here, most of the time writer.ready will be pending. When the sink eventually wants a chunk, writer.ready temporarily becomes resolved and waits for a chunk to be written. Once that happens, writer.ready becomes pending again.

makes it sound like HWM = 0 is perfect for this use case. When the sink wants a chunk, it will signal that through writer.ready.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1158#issuecomment-916487878