Re: [heycam/webidl] Normative: Match ECMA‑262 function property enumeration order (#914)

@bakkot to check my understanding, it seems like the correct test would be that name appears _right after_ length, right? So the test262 test is not as fully strict as it could be.

I think Web IDL, being more imperative than the ES spec, actually gives a full ordering between length/name/prototype that matches the tests written. But in terms of ensuring implementer interest for this particular change, I agree we're probably OK.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/914#issuecomment-912671148