- From: Samuel Weiler <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:31:27 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2021 18:31:40 UTC
> Feel free to review it again though. PING's normal expectation is that doc authors will start by doing a self-analysis. Even if there aren't issues, I expect the authors to make an argument for why. In some cases that's obvious. I'm not sure it is here. You might find [RFC3552 Section 5](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3552#section-5) and/or [RFC6973](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6973) helpful. I'm not sure how much the usual [TAG/PING questionnaire ](https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/)will help in this case, but it's worth looking through. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1013#issuecomment-910550777
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2021 18:31:40 UTC