- From: Timothy Gu <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:01:18 -0800
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2021 05:01:31 UTC
I like the idea of ensuring the parts don't get reinterpreted too much before allowing a non-special URL to switch to a special scheme. As an example, to allow switching to `file`, I think it's reasonable to require that: * The source URL must not have an opaque path. To switch to `http`, we should additionally require: * The source URL must have a host. (Technically this implies the first requirement.) As an additional example, Firefox and Safari currently have the following behavior: ```js u = new URL('javascript:!!notahost()'); u.protocol = 'http:'; console.assert(u.href, 'http://!!notahost()/'); // console.assert(u.href, 'http://%21%21notahost%28%29/'); // Chrome ``` which I don't think is useful or worth keeping. ---- It also sounds like escaping `\` would be quite useful for this proposal. I filed #675 to track this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/674#issuecomment-982287021
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2021 05:01:31 UTC