Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update the Acknowledgments section (PR #78)

> Looks good... if it helps, you might also consider: https://respec.org/docs/#id-gh-contributors

Thanks for the suggestion.  I just gave it a try, seems to drop quite a few names.  Not sure why, perhaps they are people who contributed to discussions but didn't write PRs.  Let's address this separately, possibly through a split list of PR-authors vs other contributors (need to remove dups between the two lists though).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/pull/78#issuecomment-970396591