Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebAuthn minPinLength (Issue #687)

> We can have a look, but if you're just adding to WebAuthn and the ramifications will all be within WebAuthn, we don't need to check it. :)

Hi Hadley,

While this might end up being just a simple addition to WebAuthn, it's hard to tell with web platform features when this is the case, or if there is some other unforeseen complication or relation to another feature. That's why the Blink process asks for a TAG review for all new features, even if they appear to be very small.

If it would help, maybe there could be a bit TAG review requesters could set that says something like "I think this feature is trivial/very simple", but IMO it will still be hard to judge, for the reason mentioned above.

I think it'd be better if the TAG could just quickly review situations like this review, and if it does appear to be entirely simple and self-contained, just resolve the review as satisfied, with a comment delegating trust that the spec WG's consensus system already covered it.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/687#issuecomment-969206844