Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Anonymous iframes (#639)

Thanks @ArthurSonzogni  that's very helpful. Can this info be brought into the explainer to make that document more clear (including the linked user needs)?  This looks good to us on the basis of it being a stopgap. Can you please progress the open issues including the one [Tess pointed to](https://github.com/camillelamy/explainers/issues/20). Spec-wise where is this going? Is this headed to HTML?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/639#issuecomment-963404179