- From: Amy Guy <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 06:44:41 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 8 November 2021 14:44:53 UTC
Another option (as well as the visual indicator) for alerting the user - and in particular other people in the vicinity whose privacy may unknowingly be compromised - could be to require a sound, in a similar why to how camera apps are required to make the shutter sound in certain jurisdictions. What other web platform APIs could be completely prohibited from use while the Raw Camera Access API is in use, without completely removing the utility of Raw Camera Access? Something like this might encourage developers to only use it if they really really need to, as well as protect privacy by restricting what other kinds of information can simultaneously be transmitted back to the origin. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/652#issuecomment-963229752
Received on Monday, 8 November 2021 14:44:53 UTC