Re: [w3c/permissions] Proposals: Drop "Powerful features registry" and PermissionName enum (Issue #314)

Would it make sense to move this list to something on the new [Registry track](https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#registries)? The "at risk" permissions could be "provisional" in IANA terminology, with a first-come-first-served policy, while the rest could be "standard" with a CR or REC (or equivalent in another SDO) required.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/314#issuecomment-961263802

Received on Thursday, 4 November 2021 17:31:28 UTC