Re: [whatwg/fetch] Return a "controller" instance from fetch (#1329)

> As noted on Matrix we need to account for service workers and in particular "handle fetch". Either we make it so that "handle fetch" returns a controller for the service worker fetch event, or we pass the controller into "handle fetch" so the service worker can observe it. The former seems a bit nicer as it reuses the pattern introduced here and could be used for other kinds of information exchange in the future. It would require "handle fetch" to take a callback.
> 
> @yutakahirano @jakearchibald @noamr thoughts?

I like the idea of returning a controller from SW's fetch rather than having SW query its caller fetch for "is terminated"... 
Does it affect this PR?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1329#issuecomment-958802723