Re: [whatwg/fetch] Editorial: make WebSocket use obtain a connection (#1241)

@sleevi commented on this pull request.



> @@ -7425,32 +7417,6 @@ fetch("https://www.example.com/")
 </div>
 
 
-<h3 id=websocket-connections>Connections</h3>
-
-<p>To <dfn id=concept-websocket-connection-obtain>obtain a WebSocket connection</dfn>, given a
-<var>url</var>, run these steps:
-
-<ol>
- <li><p>Let <var ignore>host</var> be <var>url</var>'s <a for=url>host</a>.
-
- <li><p>Let <var ignore>port</var> be <var>url</var>'s <a for=url>port</a>.
-
- <li><p>Let <var ignore>secure</var> be false, if <var>url</var>'s <a for=url>scheme</a> is
- "<code>http</code>", and true otherwise.
-
- <li><p>Follow the requirements stated in step 2 to 5, inclusive, of the first set of steps in
- <a href=http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455#section-4.1>section 4.1</a> of The WebSocket Protocol

@ricea Could you expand on the following comment?

> Dealing with proxies is awful and Chromium does it completely wrong.

I’m having trouble making sense of it in the context of this PR, or in general for Chrome, and just trying to sort through if this was a remark specific to WebSockets and the throttling not being able to adhere fully to the spec (because the spec is wrong), or if this was something else.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1241#discussion_r639908844