Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] ModuleServiceWorker (#617)

In retrospect, I think @ghazale-hosseinabadi linked an implementation design document in the TAG review.  The best explainer, though, is probably the spec issue where this was discussed, consensus was reached, and it was spec'd:

https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/831

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/617#issuecomment-848805276