Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Back/Forward Cache (#628)

Thanks @hober! We’ve sent PRs to update the documents ([1](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-principles/pull/317), [2](https://github.com/w3ctag/security-questionnaire/pull/128)) and will open more spec issues for BFCache, tracked in the [BFCache meta-bug](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5880).

We will also continue working with owners of current APIs (and start contacting ones we haven’t reached out to yet) to figure out how BFCache fits into their API. We’re grateful that TAG supports our goal, and we hope TAG can help by checking for the "bfcache consideration" bit for future APIs in TAG reviews!

Thanks again!


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/628#issuecomment-843948116