Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Early design review: Sanitizer API (#619)

@hober, @hadleybeeman and I looked at this during a breakout today. 

We are glad to see the recent improvements based on earlier feedback. Note that I wasn't saying that the "very long default config" wasn't readable, just that the longer it is, the more tedious it would be for authors to replicate it. However, now that it's exposed, that wouldn't be a problem.

We all thought that Document Fragment sanitization should be exposed via a more general method instead of residing in this API. [I did open an issue on this](https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/965) a while ago, and it is ongoing.

Overall, we're happy with the direction this is going, and are considering closing this review. Thank you for doing this very valuable and highly needed work!

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/619#issuecomment-839890598

Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2021 15:59:51 UTC