- From: Daniel Appelquist <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 09:52:19 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2021 16:52:31 UTC
Some more feedback from our f2f discussion: We're happy to see this effort happening. Thanks for listening to our feedback. Adding additional complexity to the web platform remains a problem. We're concerned about adding a new API that has to do with history which developers will find confusing on top of the existing history API. At the same time it's clear that it's meeting a user need. The example of XHR and Fetch came up in our discussion. In that case, it was clear what we were asking developers to do - migrate to Fetch. Can we do the same with this API? So we'd like to better understand how this can be added to the web platform whilst also mitigating against the complexity issue. However we're generally happy to see this go forward. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/605#issuecomment-838820154
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2021 16:52:31 UTC