Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR Device API (#545)

Yeah, we've been meaning to write up that document, it's been taking some time.

We've worked with the privacy WG to figure out an acceptable solution for fingerprinting. Importantly: it takes a bunch of consent to get to the point where a website will know what hardware a user has (you basically have to start a session).  The API that produces capability info _without_ starting a session is extremely coarse grained ("vr support"/"ar support"/"none"), and may also have a consent prompt depending on the situation in the UA. Note that most mobile phones running Chrome have "ar support" now so this is not really a signal of affluence.

See https://immersive-web.github.io/webxr/#issessionsupported-fingerprinting

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/545#issuecomment-838684448

Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2021 15:30:41 UTC